Yisrael Harel, founder of the Yesha Council and the first to head it, is convinced that the widespread discourse surrounding sovereignty does not justify a split between the heads of settlers in Judea and Samaria.

"I propose all parties cool down. Sovereignty is reversible. I'd like to mention that Menachem Begin applied the sovereignty law to the Golan. Then Rabin, Barak, and especially Bibi came and negotiated a pullback from the Golan. That is, once you make a decision on sovereignty, this isn't the end of the story," Harel says in an Arutz Sheva interview.

He said, "It isn't just about territories that weren't previously sovereign Israel. In the Trump program and in previous programs, we were ready to give up parts of the Negev. Remember this is not exactly the Trump plan, but the one who engineered the plan is our own Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and according to the agreement we're supposed to give up the Halutza area.

"It shouldn't be taken in such seriousness it plunges us into divisions - certainly not to the extent of calling some colleagues who are ready to compromise on this issue 'traitors'.

Harel made the point about the central significance of applying sovereignty. "There's one significant implication here: Today we're under Civil Administration rule. In all matters of land acquisition and construction - our government is the civilian administration. Anti-settlement elements have settled in the Civil Administration in recent decades, especially in legal counsel. Once we apply sovereignty it will move to the civilian level. The Interior Ministry will be the address for building permits and for any similar issue we won't have to go to the Civil Administration and this is a huge advance, especially when you have a government that supports you. With everything we have in our hearts against Binyamin Netanyahu - and we have a lot - you cannot say that we won't have an attentive ear in this government, even with Aryeh Deri who in the past because of him came upon us the Oslo disaster."

Yisrael Harel argues that the price the U.S. is asking for sovereignty is too high and therefore believes that sovereignty must be held onto, but wisely. Read more at Arutz-7