Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara called for the High Court of Justice to strike down the reasonableness standard law in a Sunday morning opinion, the second time that her office has sanctioned the cancellation of a basic law amendment.

The legal opinion, which came ahead of the hearing next Tuesday, acknowledged the sensitivity of engaging in judicial review of basic laws, but explained that the amendment closed the door on recourse for people and groups harmed by unreasonable government decisions. The law removed the means for the public to defend themselves against arbitrary use of authority against them. 

The law's limiting of this power created a "constitutional black hole" in accountability between the different powers, said the opinion. The court's ability to review government administrative decisions served as a longstanding check and balance, which are required to maintain a democratic legal system, said the opinion. Moreover, reasonableness law was part of a broader legal agenda that would allegedly undermine Israel's democratic regime, the judicial reform. The court needed to view the law under this broader scope when deciding to strike it down.

A further void in the law was created by the law, the Attorney-General's Office said, in relation to the requirement for officials to act reasonably -- to explain and justify their policies and work as insurance against corruption and nepotism. The requirement guides the hand of individual officials for thousands of decisions, which removes the necessity of court action. Without the reasonableness guidelines, policy may be informed more  by political and personal extraneous considerations rather than public interest.... Read More: JPost