Anyone who talks, texts, emails or scans the web on a cellphone while driving should consider this a warning.

Police could soon have a device that could catch drivers red-handed. It's called a "textalyzer," and it's modeled after a Breathalyzer.

Russell Hurd has a photo album full of treasured reminders of his daughter, Heather Hurd, who died in a car crash. The memories make him smile, laugh and cry. She was 26.

"In just a second, my whole life; my family's life was destroyed. My daughter lost her life, but we were sentenced to life," Russell Hurd said.

A tractor-trailer driver texting behind the wheel, going 65 mph became so distracted that he didn't notice Heather Hurd's car stopped at a red light. He never applied the brakes.

"They described it as a bomb going off in the car," Russell Hurd said.

In 2009, Russell Hurd successfully convinced Maryland lawmakers to pass legislation prohibiting texting while driving. He doesn't believe it goes far enough. He supports creating a law allowing police to use a tool that can instantly confirm whether a driver was texting behind the wheel.

The device is called a "textalyzer." It works as a Breathalyzer for electronics. The 11 News I-Team drove in a controlled parking lot to demonstrate how the device works.

"The way this is envisioned is the police don't need to look at your phone screen or touch it. They just hand you the cable. You insert the cable into the phone," said Jim Grady, CEO of Cellebrite, the company that will manufacture the textalyzer.

The police would see a screen that logs phone activity like the Facebook app, What's app, text messages and phone calls. Plus, everything has a time stamp. No actual content is revealed.

The device can also tell the difference between a voice-activated text and typing. The prototype that the I-Team demonstrated only works with certain apps and one type of phone. The plan is to eventually tailor it to laws in individual jurisdictions.

"Once there's a law that describes exactly what needs to be done, we'll develop the product and try to cover as many apps as we can right at the beginning," Grady said.

The American Civil Liberties Union considers the concept of the textalyzer intrusive and a Fourth Amendment violation. The U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld that argument.

"The question is, is there a technological solution to it? Or is the solution social? And does the law allow the particular technological solution that is being proposed here, which is asking for carte blanche for this untested and intrusive technology? And I think the answer to that is no," said David Rocah, an attorney for ALCU Maryland.

But advocates contend that no one can afford to wait for texting behind the wheel to become socially unacceptable.

"Everyone has a Heather in their life. We are trying to prevent them from being killed as well," Russell Hurd said.